Tax proposal burns lawmakers, farmers

Tax proposal burns lawmakers, farmers

Traci White

Clarence Emerson, a Pittsylvania County tobacco farmer, drives his truck out to his tobacco fields on Friday. Emerson and many other tobacco farmers may be impacted if a proposed increase on cigarette taxes is passed by the state.

» 12 Comments | Post a Comment

As the state government brainstorms options to counter a looming budget deficit, local politicians and those involved in the tobacco industry resoundingly oppose Gov. Timothy M. Kaine’s proposed sales tax increase on cigarettes.

They cite general economic malaise and particular concerns for Southside residents.

Kaine announced proposals this week to address a projected $2.9 billion budget shortfall, including spending cuts in every sector of the government, from streamlining transportation operations to holding off on state employee salary increases, along with a doubling of the 30-cent tax on cigarettes.

“I think everyone recognizes that this is going to be one of the most challenging budget scenarios we’ve faced in many, many years,” said Sen. Robert Hurt, R-Chatham, who added that he applauded the governor for tackling the spending side of the budget, and said that’s where the legislature’s focus should be.

“You have got to get spending under control,” Hurt said.

Delegate Don Merricks, R-Pittsylvania County, agreed.

“This is not the time to raise taxes,” he said. If anything, Merricks said, history has shown that lowering taxes increases revenues because people have more money to spend.

“Consumer confidence is at an all-time low and justly so,” he said. “It’s like a merry-go-round; where do you jump on? People are cutting back, they’re losing their jobs, their income is cut, they’re not buying, the state’s not getting taxes and it just keeps going.”

Delegate Danny Marshall, R-Danville, also argued that Virginia retailers close to North Carolina will be hurt as people may just go over the border to purchase cigarettes.

“When they’re over there buying cigarettes, they’re going to buy other things, too,” he said.

For his part, Kaine argued that his proposal isn’t a general tax increase that would put a strain on Virginia families already struggling. Rather, he said, it is “targeted to a specific non-essential product.”


The rationale

In his proposal, Kaine explained the rationale behind raising taxes on cigarettes as one relating directly to the state’s second-highest spending bracket: health care.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that cigarette smoking causes $400 million per year in Medicaid expenses for the state.

Virginia’s current cigarette tax raises only $167 million per year to cover that cost, Kaine said, meaning Virginians pay another $233 million a year in taxes to support Medicaid costs related to smoking. Not to mention all the non-Medicaid related smoking costs.

“I believe that the taxes on smoking should pay for the budget costs incurred because of smoking,” he said in a written statement.

The tax increase would generate another $148 million in revenue that would go directly toward the Health Care Fund, which supports Medicaid.

The tax, Kaine spokesman Gordon Hickey said, “could have a huge impact when people realize how much money we spend on tobacco-related health issues.”


Industry impact

Kaine’s hope and tobacco farmers’ fear are one in the same: a high enough premium on smoking might convince some people to quit.

Kaine, in his statement, argued that could reduce financial burdens on the health care system. Tobacco farmers worry about who will buy their products.

“When the prices of cigarettes go up, (smokers are) not going to keep paying those high prices,” tobacco farmer Clarence Emerson said. “The domestic demand goes down, the demand from companies is down, and that’s going to come back to us.”

Local legislators agree with that assessment, saying that any increase in cigarettes would impact everyone involved in tobacco production. While acknowledging that the industry has declined in recent years, it is still a major part of the economy.

“The tobacco business has been a mainstay of the economy of Virginia,” Marshall said, “There are a lot of tobacco jobs here.”

Danville and Pittsylvania Country growers would be particularly hard hit because of the nature of purchasing structures, according to local growers and agronomists.

Philip Morris has receiving stations across the region designated as either domestic or international. Those labeled domestic manufacture cigarettes sold in the United States.

The receiving station in Danville is strictly for domestic consumption, “so (the tax increase) would have a huge impact on the industry,” said grower and co-founder of Concerned Friends for Tobacco, C.D. Bryant of Blairs.

The governor’s office doesn’t quite see it that way.

“Philip Morris is a huge, multinational company and this small amount of tax increase will have a minimal effect, if any, on them,” Hickey said.

“You still end up with a cigarette tax that’s about the half the national average and much lower than other states, which means a small, if any, impact on the business side of things.”


Balancing act

By Virginia law, the state’s budget must be balanced, so there can be no deficit.

It’s this stipulation that Hurt said makes Virginia one of the best-managed states and more business friendly. However, it also has lead to Kaine’s spending cuts and cigarette tax hike.

Despite the major disagreement over the tobacco tax increase, lawmakers are confident Virginia will emerge soundly.

“We will balance our budget,” Hurt said, “and we will be stronger for it.”

Contact Sarah Arkin at or (434) 791-7983.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by sulu69 on December 22, 2008 at 7:49 pm

I wish Obama would have picked Barney Frank. Tim Kaine should have only been picked for a pooper scooper at a dog pound.

Flag Comment Posted by videodoktor on December 22, 2008 at 2:28 pm

Ain’t you glad Obama didn’t pick him for Vice President. Why not tax liquor more? People working are having a tough time and they never know when the axe will fall on them. How many on Medicaid are cheating?

Flag Comment Posted by pooh on December 21, 2008 at 10:37 pm

I am not surprised by Gov. Kaine’s proposed tax on tobacco. The goverment uses tobacco users of all kinds to get the funding for all budget problems. They say that state raises are on hold,but what they didn’t tell you was how much of a cost of living raise they received. Not only does our great state want more taxes on tobacco(which hurts the ones who can least afford it)
the FDA wants a tax to cover their cost of opperaction for over seeing tobacco(when approved), and our furture leaders want a tax on tobbaco to cover the child health care program. So I ask you, how in the world is on group of people supose to pay for all of these govermenfunding. We’re not my friend. We need to stand together and make a differance.If that doesn’t work crime rates will sky rockets,black market tobacco will triple and the entire goverment will not have any funding to plan a budjet. All because the goverment seems to forget how much money thay get from tobacco production (taxes),income (taxes)by employes of tobacoo companys, buying (taxes)paid to state when buisness purchase tobacco, and sales (taxes) paid when you purchase tobacco. So I ask you if Millons of people lose their jobs because tobacco company’s (from farmers to stores)can not pay for all the increase in taxes,
What then.America will lose more jobs to over see countries who do not tax company’s out of buisness, millions more will be unemployed and this great country will be in the greatest depression the world has ever seen. And who will bell us out. Surely not the goverment, because hard working, honest people like us pay for the goverment and corparate gread while their furtune keeps growing. But what happens when theirs nothing left to take?

Flag Comment Posted by sulu69 on December 21, 2008 at 8:24 pm

As a lifelong GAY Democrat I cannot stand Tim Kaine. He lets off KILLERS and now he wants to up taxes. The next thing he will want tax is Condoms and KY.

Flag Comment Posted by TaleGator on December 21, 2008 at 4:14 pm

DavidL, although I think you mostly said it in jest, you are absolutely correct that taxing unhealthy, fatty foods would lead to decreasing obesity rates and decreased medical costs for society as a whole. Problem is, there are gray areas when food is considered - do you tax the food that is only “somewhat” unhealthy, and if so, how do you determine the degree of unhealthiness, and then where do you draw the line where taxation begins. Plus, food is necessary for our existence. Tobacco is more cut-and-dried. It is unhealthy and unnecessary, making it easy to determine where taxation should begin.

At my core, I’m at the Libertarian position on taxing tobacco - let people poison their own bodies if they want to because it’s none of our business, and don’t try to influence their behavior through taxation. But since society ultimately is responsible for the results of this behavior (and whether THAT’S a good idea is another discussion entirely) society should have a say in regulating this behavior. Short of outlawing tobacco althogether, taxation is one way to try to keep those who will be unable to pay for their own medical treatment from ever needing that medical treatment in the first place.

Flag Comment Posted by TaleGator on December 21, 2008 at 9:13 am

While I almost always oppose tax increases and almost always disagree with Gov. Kaine, this is something I can get on board with. People at the lower end of the economic spectrum will not be able to afford this tax increase and will cut back or quit taking this poison. These are the same people who, statistically, are without health insurance, so we’re picking up the tab for their tobacco related illnesses anyway, making this a win-win for everyone except the tobacco farmers/businessmen. Tobacco is not just unnecessary, it’s counterproductive to our wellbeing. As education programs continue to work, fewer and fewer people will begin using tobacco, and it will go away. I see no problem with hastening it’s demise. Hopefully, being savvy businessmen, these tobacco farmers have seen the writing on the wall and are making preparations to enter some other line of work.

Flag Comment Posted by news_u_can_use on December 21, 2008 at 7:07 am

I have said it before, and I will say it again,  Tim Kaine never met a tax increase he did not like. If it is not tobacco, it will be something else.  Cutting spending never has crossed his mind.

Flag Comment Posted by Oops on December 21, 2008 at 3:12 am

Another well written, thoughtful article by Ms Arkin. She is a credit to journalism.

These so called “tobacco” farmers sold out to the Federal Government several years ago. Their political influence in this area died before that. They destroyed what had been a lifeline to many families and a way to make a decent living. They are now owned by the tobacco companies.

Flag Comment Posted by lady on December 20, 2008 at 11:42 pm

Where does the merry go round stop?  If the tobacco industy fall then the economy falls more so as it provides jobs to alot of people.  Govt. screams because of medicaid costs due to health issues due to smoking, but they are so eager to tax the heck out of the consumer in every direction.  What about alcohol?  How many look at what alcohol costs the american economy health wise as well as lives lost to illness related to alcholism and drunk driving accidents.  Nobody has sued the Budweiser Company or Jim Beam for their loved ones killed, jailed, injured, or addiction to it.  What about Jack?  Jack gets off scott free when someone has had too much of him and drives drunk.  Let someone scream about the health related issues from tobacco and then there is a law suit.  Nobody put that Marboro in your mouth.  Nobody has ever had a fatal accident from smoking, nor have they ever killed someone because they smoked too much.  So if govt. is going to go after the tobacco industries so hard why not go after the alcohol companies too.  Nobody has ever gotten arrested for smoking too much while driving….Look at what alcohol has cost the tax payers…jail, deaths, courts, families, abuse to families, health issues are also involved.  Yet nobody looks at them.  Has anyone ever done a study on alcohol and the costs to the health care system and the judicial system?  Why?  Guess you just don’t mess around with Jack?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

GoDanRiver: Place an Ad | Buy Photos | Subscribe | Email Us | Email Alerts | Mobile Alerts | Make Us Your Home Page | Site Search
Partners: GoDanRiver is a service of the Danville Register Bee, the Eden Daily News, the Reidsville Review and the Madison Messenger.
Regional Partner Links: Lynchburg News & Advance | WSLS | Winston-Salem Journal | headlineVA.com