Rules of the road: where can motorized scooters travel

Rules of the road: where can motorized scooters travel

Denice Thibodeau

A white floral cross with a spray of roses — with a single red rose lying on the ground at its base — now stands in front of the home of Ann Gray Towler, 61.

» 15 Comments | Post a Comment

A white floral cross with a spray of roses — with a single red rose lying on the ground at its base — now stands in front of the home of Ann Gray Towler, 61.

Towler is the Danville woman who was killed early Tuesday as she attempted to cross Westover Drive in her motorized scooter.

A news release from the Danville Police Department said the driver of a 1994 Honda Accord attempted to swerve around Towler, but hit her with the front passenger side of the car.

The 61-year-old Danville resident was on her way to Goodwill Industries, a block and a half from her home, where she had worked in various capacities for 27 years. Most recently, Towler had worked processing donations as a rack hanger.

Gary Cotta, Goodwill’s CEO and president, said Tuesday that Towler typically arrived at Goodwill early; Towler was struck at about 6:20 a.m.

Goodwill’s Human Resources Assistant Wendy Pickeral said Towler could not walk well and spent most of her time in the motorized scooter, which was also her primary means of transportation.

Where can motorized scooters and wheelchairs travel?

State law defines both motorized scooters and wheelchairs as “electric personal assistive mobility devices.” They are prohibited from driving on interstate highways, but can be driven on roads with speeds of 25 mph or less if there are no sidewalks available.

The speed posted on Westover Drive in the stretch from Towler’s home to Goodwill is 35 mph, and there are no sidewalks — but there are bicycle lanes on both sides of the street, except for a half-block stretch on the westbound side. Drivers of a wheelchair in the bike lane have the same rights and duties as a pedestrian.

There are no traffic signals or marked crosswalks that would make it safer for a pedestrian in that stretch of Westover Drive.

Towler was hit as she attempted to cross the street at about 6:20 a.m. She made it across the eastbound lane and was hit as she crossed the westbound lane.

State laws require motorized wheelchairs/scooters to have a white headlight visible in clear weather from 500 feet away, and a red reflector in the rear that is visible from 600 feet behind the wheelchair/scooter, if the device is being operated after dark, from sunset to sunrise.

Sgt. B.L. Robertson, of the Danville Police Department, said Towler’s scooter had no lights or reflectors.

No charges have been filed against the driver of the vehicle that struck Towler. Danville Police Department Lt. Doug Crawford said the investigation is ongoing.

Were better transportation methods available?

Goodwill Industries and the Danville Division of Social Services were both asked if Towler had ever requested transportation assistance for getting from her home to work.

John Moody, director of Social Services, said the agency does help clients with transportation problems, supplying some with bus tokens or even paying to fix a broken-down vehicle. Apparently, however, Towler had not applied to DSS for assistance — Moody said she was not a customer of the agency.

Representatives from Goodwill could not immediately answer the question. Cotta was out of town and could not be reached Wednesday; Pickeral said he would have to answer any questions relating to employee transportation assistance.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by normal_person on December 18, 2009 at 10:32 am

sorry guys, I guess I was just too sensitive yesterday.

Tis the season!

Flag Comment Posted by SpencerO on December 17, 2009 at 7:05 pm

Rockit, I agree with you (fancy that!!). And I can’t follow Wendy’s posts ..  they are rather poorly written to say the least.

Flag Comment Posted by LooneysPeaches on December 17, 2009 at 4:35 pm

This is very sad and tragic accident for all concerned.  Having lived on/and associated with Westover Drive area since 1966; I feel I am qualified to give my opinion.  This road is very dangerous.  The posted speed limit maybe 35 or 40 mph but it is most always exceeded.  I cannot fault the driver because I am sure they did all that was possible to avoid hitting this dear lady.  Given the exact area, time of day,  I am sure all of this played a part into the factors of this terrible accident.  I feel bad and sympathize with all concerned.  As far as the Reg & Bee leading with such a headline in a time like this?  I do think more compassion for the families would have been more appropriate now.  As I stated earlier, Westover is a very bad road at any time….
May God bless all concerned….

Flag Comment Posted by Randall D on December 17, 2009 at 4:28 pm

So the newspaper publishes the rules, (which should be common sense) and they are criticized?  They are trying to prevent more deaths and injuries by letting people know it is dangerous (and foolish)nand unlawful to travel in certain places on these caskets on wheels.  That is what they are, if they are used in circumstances where they are certain to produce accidents which will certainly end in death or serious injury.  Some people can’t be happy, no matter what.  Don’t do this, you are negligent.  Do this, and you are criticized.  Society today is pitiful.

This is not directed at the deceased, or their famliy. But to the general public.  Wake up people.

Flag Comment Posted by Rockit on December 17, 2009 at 2:25 pm

The R&B certainly doesn’t need me to take up for them.  However, I must say I don’t see anything wrong with publishing an article like this in response to the trajedy it references.  There have been one or two other articles in the R&B about this incident.  Seems that this article is focusing in on the dos and don’ts of scooter operation (i.e., 25 mph zone, lights or reflectors, etc.).  What’s wrong with that? 

If someone died in a house fire due to a faulty electrical blanket, and the newspaper published an article providing safety tips for using an electric blanket, would you have a problem with that?  One purpose of newspapers is to inform.  It looks like that is what they are doing here.

Flag Comment Posted by jfancy on December 17, 2009 at 2:18 pm

First of all I’m very sorry for both Families.. And second why did’nt the lady of the scooter take the CityBus to work instead of traveling herslef..I would’nt want to drive that are a bicycle on WestOver Drive people do not go the speed on that road and it’s not wide enough to be a four lane.. I travel thru there sometime on my way out to 58 and there is barely room for two car’s to pass..

Flag Comment Posted by normal_person on December 17, 2009 at 1:54 pm

My problem is with the register and bee in this article.

“Where can motorized scooters and wheelchairs travel?“

That’s your response when a person is killed?


Maybe the writer (Denice Thibodeau) could contact the family of this victim and describe the state laws…?

Flag Comment Posted by wendywilkins on December 17, 2009 at 12:34 pm

I would like to say I did not intend to say it the way it came out I do no that this person will have to live with it.By almeans I no that nobody would hit nobody like that on purpose and i do say i am SORRY for the way it came out

Flag Comment Posted by getitright on December 17, 2009 at 12:20 pm

First of all i would like to send my prayers out to both families.Now i have a question and i hope someone can help me understand this.Why is it that parttime employees that work for the public school system can not file for unemployment,or should i say can not get unemployment.please help me with this one.

Flag Comment Posted by Rockit on December 17, 2009 at 11:45 am

Wendywilkins

Shame on you.  That’s right, I said it, shame on you you lousy piece of crap.

You gave a very warm and moving testimonial to your friend and then totally screwed it up with your attack on the driver involved in this accident.  How dare you!  Who the heck appointed you judge, jury, and executioner of this driver who by all reports thus far attempted to avoid hitting your friend who was out on the road in the dark without any type of reflectors or lights.  How dare you!

A better question you should be asking yourself is why you didn’t help this woman.  Obviously you knew she had a hard time getting around.  Obviously you knew she was acting dangerously in riding up and down the road.  Obviously you knew some kind of assistance was appropriate.  But, you did nothing.  And now she’s gone.  Thanks a lot.  With friends like you who needs enemys!

“Think about what you done and drive more safely.“  Maybe you should think about what you done in not helping this fine lady when you could. 

Shame on you Wendy, shame on you.  You are at least partially responsible for this woman’s death.  Live with that.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

GoDanRiver: Place an Ad | Buy Photos | Subscribe | Email Us | Email Alerts | Mobile Alerts | Make Us Your Home Page | Site Search
Partners: GoDanRiver is a service of the Danville Register Bee, the Eden Daily News, the Reidsville Review and the Madison Messenger.
Regional Partner Links: Lynchburg News & Advance | WSLS | Winston-Salem Journal | headlineVA.com