If property owners don’t mow yards, the city will — for a price
Vincent Marchisotto lives in Yancyville, N.C., but also owns an empty house in Danville — one that he has just been charged $170 for the city to mow.
“I have no intention of paying the bill,” Marchisotto said, which he said he considers excessive.
Marchisotto claims he has repeatedly contacted the city, asking them to notify him by e-mail when the lawn needs cutting. He said he feels this is a reasonable request, even though City Code requires he be contacted by mail, in person or through simply having a notice posted at the property.
Barry Doebert, director of the administrative division of Public Works, said the City Code states how they are allowed to contact owners of properties that have become overgrown, and his department takes it even a step further, sending the mailed notices by certified mail, so they have a signature that proves it has been received.
“We don’t notify by e-mail because there is no guarantee that it has been received and read,” Doebert said.
Doebert said over the course of a summer the city mows about 2,000 lawns, some of which are repeats for absentee property owners. The owners are billed the cost of the mowing, which is done by a contracted lawn service, plus a $100 administration fee. The amount charged for the mowing varies, depending on the size of the lawn and the difficulty in mowing it.
The $100 administration fee is fair, Doebert said, because of the amount of time and paperwork it takes to legally go on someone’s property and mow their lawn.
For the process to begin, there has to be a complaint from a neighbor, or a code enforcement officer has to spot a problem yard and begin the paperwork.
If the lawn has grown to a 12-inch height, a letter is mailed to the owner telling them the property must be mowed. If the letter is received and the lawn is still not mowed — or if the letter is refused — a sign is posted on the property warning the owner that he has seven days to mow it, or the city will.
If that still doesn’t result in the lawn being mowed, the city will arrange to have it mowed, and invoice the property owner.
Paperwork is filed every step of the way, and photographs of the property in question are taken before, during and after every city-authorized mowing job is done.
Because of the time it takes to send the letters and post the notices, the lawn could be 18-24 inches high before the city can finally steps in and mows, Doebert said.
“We want to give the owner every opportunity not to have us on their property,” Doebert said.
Doebert said this “weed abatement” program is just one of five code enforcement areas former City Manager Jerry Gwaltney assigned to public works about eight years ago.
“He didn’t like how the city looked and wanted it cleaned up,” Doebert said.
Public Works also oversees code enforcement at junkyards, enforces rules about removing inoperable vehicles and illegal accumulation of trash on properties and removes hazardous trees.
All of these services incur fees that can result in liens against the property if they are not paid. If those charges ultimately add up to 50 percent of the property’s assessed value, the city can “capture” the property, Doebert said.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
why does the city have to notify you anyway to upkeep your property that you own and pay taxes on. Common sense should let you know that grass grows and may need to be cut at least once a month, do you think it quits growing because no one lives there. Way to to Danville, charge them lazy azzzz home owners
I think that a large jug of Round Up only cost about $40.00..
Jerry Gwaltney is long gone he tookmthe money and ran. Yet this is another example of how he left the citizens and property owners of danville holding the bag and paying the tab for his incompetence. Where are the small government folks on this one. somebody should mention this at the next TEA PARTY.
Everyday Danville does something even stupide than the day before. Why is the city contracting out to a private lawncare company, when they have inmates on the Danville City Farm cutting grass all day everyday for 1 dollar a day. How much since does it make to hire a private contractor. Furthermore the City needs to show where they sent this guy a certified letter. For jimmystick he has to be a democrat why ? because he didnt get an illegal immigrant to do it for him as all you fatcat republicans do. Plain and simple Danville is surely becomming the laughingstock of the commonwealth. Imean really whats next.
The city is doing their part to notify these homeowners to get the grass cut, weeds or what ever. Then they have the nerve to come back and say they don’t think it is right. TOUGH. You were notified. If you don’t like it. Sell the property or get the tenants to cut the grass.
This guy has to be a democrat to not know when his yard at a vacant house needs to be mowed. The city cannot even pick up yard debris on time so it amazes me that they would actually cut someones yard. If this brilliant demcrat would have just cut it every two weeks he would not owe the city. I am glad that this guy lives in Yanceyville because one more person this stupid is something that Danville does not need!
MY MY…. THIS IS HILARIOUSLY SAD!!!!!!! COULD THE CITY ALSO REMIND ME WHEN TO TAKE MY TRASH TO THE CURB? COME ON NOW….LET THE CITY PLEASE FOCUS ON MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES. LORD KNOWS THEY NEED TO!!!!!!
I’m with the city on this. Why should it be the city’s responsibility to notify you when your grass needs cut? Even if the property is vacant! On average, you’re going to have to mow the grass about (emphasis on “about”) every 3 weeks. Maybe more if we have a lot of rain, maybe less if it’s real dry. As a property owner, you already know that. Why do you have to be notified by the city for any reason? I mean, this guy lives in Yanceyville. How difficult is it for him to just swing by once a week and check on HIS property? I could understand it if he lived in Charlotte or Richmond but then all he’d have to do is make arrangements with someone to keep an eye on his property.
As far as the email thing, okay sure, if the city’s going to notify him anyway, they should use email. And he can’t complain saying he didn’t get email since that’s the notification method he chooses. But still, this is just ridiculous. Nobody should require the city to make them take care of their own property. And if they do, fine the daylights out of’em.
Find us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Advertisement