If property owners don’t mow yards, the city will — for a price

» 28 Comments | Post a Comment

Vincent Marchisotto lives in Yancyville, N.C., but also owns an empty house in Danville — one that he has just been charged $170 for the city to mow.

“I have no intention of paying the bill,” Marchisotto said, which he said he considers excessive.

Marchisotto claims he has repeatedly contacted the city, asking them to notify him by e-mail when the lawn needs cutting. He said he feels this is a reasonable request, even though City Code requires he be contacted by mail, in person or through simply having a notice posted at the property.

Barry Doebert, director of the administrative division of Public Works, said the City Code states how they are allowed to contact owners of properties that have become overgrown, and his department takes it even a step further, sending the mailed notices by certified mail, so they have a signature that proves it has been received.

“We don’t notify by e-mail because there is no guarantee that it has been received and read,” Doebert said.

Doebert said over the course of a summer the city mows about 2,000 lawns, some of which are repeats for absentee property owners. The owners are billed the cost of the mowing, which is done by a contracted lawn service, plus a $100 administration fee. The amount charged for the mowing varies, depending on the size of the lawn and the difficulty in mowing it.

The $100 administration fee is fair, Doebert said, because of the amount of time and paperwork it takes to legally go on someone’s property and mow their lawn.

For the process to begin, there has to be a complaint from a neighbor, or a code enforcement officer has to spot a problem yard and begin the paperwork.

If the lawn has grown to a 12-inch height, a letter is mailed to the owner telling them the property must be mowed. If the letter is received and the lawn is still not mowed — or if the letter is refused — a sign is posted on the property warning the owner that he has seven days to mow it, or the city will.

If that still doesn’t result in the lawn being mowed, the city will arrange to have it mowed, and invoice the property owner.

Paperwork is filed every step of the way, and photographs of the property in question are taken before, during and after every city-authorized mowing job is done.

Because of the time it takes to send the letters and post the notices, the lawn could be 18-24 inches high before the city can finally steps in and mows, Doebert said.

“We want to give the owner every opportunity not to have us on their property,” Doebert said.

Doebert said this “weed abatement” program is just one of five code enforcement areas former City Manager Jerry Gwaltney assigned to public works about eight years ago.

“He didn’t like how the city looked and wanted it cleaned up,” Doebert said.

Public Works also oversees code enforcement at junkyards, enforces rules about removing inoperable vehicles and illegal accumulation of trash on properties and removes hazardous trees.

All of these services incur fees that can result in liens against the property if they are not paid. If those charges ultimately add up to 50 percent of the property’s assessed value, the city can “capture” the property, Doebert said.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by dville resident on July 13, 2009 at 1:43 pm

I agree with getreal.  I too live near city owned properties and well lets just say they are no better than anyone else.  Lets face it dville needs a major overhaul in its officials, corruption at every level.  Chaw chewing good ol’ boy system at work at its very best.  If you are not in you are mud.  Come on folks smell the coffee.  Corruption at its finest is alive and well in DANVILLE.

Flag Comment Posted by **shortcake** on July 13, 2009 at 9:35 am

All very true about unkept properties this includes retail properties though too they must be just as responsible take a look on fixdanville.com you’ll see what i’m talking about.

Flag Comment Posted by Derragon on July 13, 2009 at 8:47 am

(get Real) 
Have you reported it ? If not you should I believe in making people accountable even if they write the rules.
If you have never been in Goverment Management they can’t be in all places at all times , The town is as good as the people who live in it(report the issue) we can’t depend on local Goverment to do it all.

Flag Comment Posted by Meee42 on July 13, 2009 at 8:43 am

Thanks Get Real..That is the very thing that I wondered about when first reading this article.

Flag Comment Posted by Get real on July 13, 2009 at 8:37 am

Well I live next door to a vacant spot which the city owns….Mighty funny it’s grass is well over 12inches….and GROWING!!!....So they need to take care of that grass too!!

Flag Comment Posted by Derragon on July 12, 2009 at 10:27 am

Lets talk about property value because your neighbor just don’t care how his yard looks…I have a great idea for the people who think charging these people to mow their grass is a bad idea.
Get together and mow their yards and the city doesn’t have to charge anyone.
You wont get any crying towels from me .

Flag Comment Posted by wanda on July 12, 2009 at 9:39 am

NEGLIGENCE is what it is called. It is not the City’s responsibility to remind anyone of their RESPONSIBILITY. How does your yard look at HOME? That’s how residents want their neighborhood to LOOK. Thanks to the city!!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by Woody McCain on July 11, 2009 at 12:19 pm

Several of you are missing the point the city is trying to make.  They don’t want to make money off of this, they just want each property owner to properly maintain the outside.  If they charge enough to make it too expensive, then the owners will step up, if they don’t, then they’ll pay.  And who wants a bunch of cons mowing their grass?  I sure don’t.  BTW, I understand that the next city to the west charges $225 each time they have to mow a private lawn.

Flag Comment Posted by mz.green on July 11, 2009 at 10:45 am

that’s right jstk-they have YOU!

Flag Comment Posted by RANDYDOWDY on July 11, 2009 at 8:34 am

Mow it once a month and stay out of trouble.  If I owned any city property, or property anywhere, I would check on it once in a while anyway.  I too think the inmates could mow it a lot cheaper than $170.  And faster as well.  I don’t feel sorry for him at all.  If he farts around on this, they should condemn the property,  and seize it.  Confiscate it through the proper channels.  For once, I don’t see this as “big brother” gone too far.  Usually I do, but not this time.  It is your responsibility to maintain your property so it is not hazardous to the community.  I think the 12” minimum is a bit low though.  That is not a hazard.  But about 18” is when they should get the ball rolling.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

GoDanRiver: Place an Ad | Buy Photos | Subscribe | Email Us | Email Alerts | Mobile Alerts | Make Us Your Home Page | Site Search
Partners: GoDanRiver is a service of the Danville Register Bee, the Eden Daily News, the Reidsville Review and the Madison Messenger.
Regional Partner Links: Lynchburg News & Advance | WSLS | Winston-Salem Journal | headlineVA.com