Area officials: Obama’s health plan a step in right direction

» 8 Comments | Post a Comment

With 46 million uninsured people in the United States, it’s easy to find folks who agree it’s past time to reform the present health care system, but agreeing on the details and how it is going to be funded, is another question.

Local health care professionals gave their opinions on the plan to overhaul American’s health care system that President Barack Obama presented before the American Medical Association on June 15.

“We’ve got to do something — it’s way past time,” said Kay Crane, executive director of Piedmont Access to Health Services, which is a federal qualified community health care center. About 40 percent of PATHS’ patients are uninsured.

Like other local health professionals contacted, Crane knows story after story of people who have died or come close to dying because of a lack of insurance. For Crane, one such story was that of her sister, who, lacking money for diagnosis and treatment, died of breast cancer, she said.

Crane admits that Obama’s plan may not be perfect, but says it’s better than what Americans have now.

“I would like people to keep an open mind and not to listen to liberals or conservatives,” she said. “This can’t be Democratic or Republican. If we don’t come up with a plan this administration, I think it’s time for people to take to the streets.”

Dr. Gary Miller, an alternate delegate to the AMA, was present at the convention where Obama presented his plan.

“I and many were pleased he took the time to talk to the medical profession,” Miller said. “Years ago under the Clinton administration, the medical profession got left out … Obama is trying to forge a bill with the backing of everybody. The idea is to help patients, and everybody might have to compromise.”


Bearing the burden

Jerel Humphrey, CEO of Danville Regional Medical Center, said that the “most critical issue facing hospitals is the growing number of uninsured patients, which puts pressure on everyone.”

Danville Regional spent more than $21 million in 2008 on charity care and bad debt, he said.

“Hospitals, like DRMC, face an increasing burden of uncompensated care every day,” he said. “Many of our residents are uninsured, poor or elderly. All Americans need affordable health insurance coverage, so they have access to quality, affordable health care.”

Humphrey said that most people would agree the basic principles of Obama’s health care reform are worthy: reducing health care cost increases, allowing Americans to choose their own doctor and health plan and enabling Americans to have quality affordable health care.

“The question is how we achieve them,” he said.

Denise Buckner, executive director of the Free Clinic of Danville, which bears much of the burden of the area’s uninsured said the clinic has had many discussions regarding the new health care proposals.

“We certainly hold to the belief that all citizens should have access to health care, and that is why so many free clinics have sprung up all over the nation,” she said. “The need is great, and with the declining economy, the numbers of uninsured are increasing. It is a concern for everyone.”

She said that the clinic doesn’t take a political stance on issues and can’t base any current decisions on “anything other than serving the current need of this community.”


Malpractice caps

Miller takes issue with Obama’s announcement that he did not support caps on medical malpractice awards — the only time Obama got booed at the convention.

“I personally think caps are beneficial because they lower benefits and keep physicians in business,” Miller said. “Premiums can be $600,000 to $700,000 for every physician in a practice — even those who haven’t been sued. We have a cap in Virginia at $2 million, which covers the vast majority of lawsuits.”

Crane also agrees that reform is needed with malpractice insurance.

“Our providers are covered under the Federal Tort Act, so when people sue, they are suing the federal government,” she said, “but if the plan could help other providers reduce their cost of malpractice insurance, doctors wouldn’t have to run every test in the book because they are afraid of getting sued.”

Miller said that it’s hard to measure how much malpractice torts cost everyone as physicians order more tests every day to cover themselves if sued for malpractice.

“Malpractice costs have gone up to eight times of what they were 15 years ago,” he said.

Another one of Obama’s proposals Miller supports is forbidding insurance companies from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

“That is unpopular with doctors and patients, with everybody,” he said, “but the insurance companies will definitely fight that.”


Paying for it

While Humphrey said access to health insurance would be the most helpful of the proposed plan, he is also concerned about how the costs would be monitored as well as the plan’s effect on insurance companies.

“The public option presents concern in that it would compete with private insurance, under-pricing premiums such that no other plans could be competitive and likely result in payments to hospitals that are below costs,” he said. “The government could arbitrarily — because it could — decide how much to pay the hospital and doctors and leave only a government-run ‘single-payer’ system.”

Miller, however, said Obama clearly stated in his speech that he is against a single-payer, national health care plan.

Crane believes the resulting competition would be one of the advantages to a public insurance option.

“In our area, we have only Anthem and Gateway Health Alliance, but a national health plan would force competition,” she said.

Then there is the question of how to pay for a public insurance option, which is estimated to be close to a trillion dollars.

Obama pledged in his speech to the AMA that any health care reform must not add to the federal deficit and listed his ideas to fund about $950 billion through such ways as limiting tax deductions to wealthy Americans, enacting spending cuts, cutting waste and inefficiency and reducing payments to hospitals for treating uninsured patients.

“Paying for it is the issue,” Miller said. “If we had the money to pay for this, we wouldn’t have opposition. Of course, every hospital is required to see indigent patients and should, so if no one is uninsured, we could take that money.”

Crane sees Obama’s plan as “basic quality health care.”

“If you want Cadillac care, you can still get Anthem,” she said. “The government is putting aside money for this plan, and some will come from revamping Medicare and Medicaid.”

Miller worries about reducing Medicare and Medicaid payments, however, feeling that if reimbursements get any lower, even more doctors will opt out of participating in the programs.

“From what I understand,” Crane said, “this plan, if people will give it a chance, will provide quality, affordable health care with the choice of keeping your own doctor, and I see it as a uniquely American solution. It is not from Canada or Germany.”


Taking responsibility

Obama listed as the second step in his plan to “invest more in preventative care” and urged Americans to be more responsible for their own health and the health of their children.

Miller, who gets up at 5 every morning to exercise, agrees.

“The American public needs to take responsibility for their health and get up off the couch and exercise,” he said. “You need to exercise 30 minutes a day four to five times a day at a minimum, and people shouldn’t eat foods known to be unhealthy, such as fried and fast foods.

“If people were healthier, they wouldn’t get sick and enter the system. We should be putting money into preventative care and getting ourselves and children eating healthier and exercising.

“We’ve met the enemy, and it is us.”

• Contact Elzey at or (434) 791-7991.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Meee42 on June 28, 2009 at 12:23 pm

What do you think Medicare is? It is National Health care. Yes they will tax the people about the same amount that they are paying in Insurance premiums. The difference will be that you won’t lose your home if you get sick. Also they need to fix these crooked drug companies. They already get HUGE Grants from the Federal Government (Tax Payer Dollars) yet they still charge Americans high dollar from meds. Bush got paid off to put a stop to seniors being able to buy their drugs (Cheaper) from Canada. Tried saying that they were inferior. They are the very same drugs that we take. They just have caps on how much Canadians have to pay. How cheap are they getting them when they can buy them from American companies and sell them at half the price (still cheaper than here) and still make a profit.The middle class in America are getting it from everyone. The ONLY way that we will get any for our money is to get a National Health Care. It will be no different than Medicare is right now. There is no competition between Insurance companies. They get together and decide what to charge right now. The ones in Washington that complain own stock in these companies. Don’t take my word for it, do your homework. The internet is the information highway. Why do you think that they allowed all of the factories to leave and bring products back into this country tax free? Bcause they own stock in those companies.

Flag Comment Posted by videodoktor on June 28, 2009 at 10:57 am

Which is worse more taxes or paying Anthem $300.00 a month in premiums. And they have many “plans” to choose from . They would not pay for a test to check for colon cancer with my plan and the plan had a high deductible. Is any one reading this have part D coverage with their Medicare. Man it looks like every insurance company under the sun is in on the thing. Once a person hits the so called doughnut hole they pay full retail for their medicine. For some this is ok if you don’t need a lot of medication, but for someone like me and my wife who has End Stage Renal failure and she hits the doughnut hole the medications she takes just takes about every dime of her Social Security check.The doughnut hole needs to be sealed up.Giving illegal aliens a free ride on Social Security no that is just not right. Did they pay taxes into Social Security.How many folks do you readers know on Social Security that have to decide if they can buy medication to help them stay alive or control blood pressure have to decide if they are going eat or buy medicine.I know a lady that receives $500.00 a month and can’t get no help from Medicaid because she owns 2 POS cars. AND yet I see people at the grocery stores in brand new cars and SUVS with Handicap parking plates and placards using food stamps how they do that? Yeah that line will cause a rush of responses. So how will a National Health plan work.Tax people to death how many people are working to pay taxes? It is scary so much to consider.Who has the answer?

Flag Comment Posted by Rockit on June 28, 2009 at 10:24 am

Maybe a starting point is to be honest about the size of the problem.  The article above references 46 million uninsured.  George Will’s Washington Post Column on Jun 21 spoke about inaccuracy of that number.

Of the 45.7 million uninsured, this is how the numbers break down:
9.7 million are not citizens.
14 million are already eligible for existing government programs but have for some reason failed to enroll (VA, Medicade, Medicare and SCHIP)
9.1 million have household incomes of at least $75,000 and could purchase their own insurance.

When you add these numbers up, that leaves you with a real number of uninsured at 13 million versus 46 million.  A problem?  Yes.  But, nowhere near the size problem advocates of national health insurance are suggesting.

Another number to keep an eye on - 1300.  That’s the number of insurance providers currently competing in the American market.  For the Obama plan to offer a public option to “keep the insurance companies honest” is laughable.  Competition keeps them “honest”.

On malpractice issues, caps certainly seem to make sense.  Something else that makes sense is what we refer to as “loser pays.“  If a frivolous lawsuit is filed against a doctor, hospital, are anyone else for that matter, and the court determines that there’s no case and throws it out, the person bringing such frivolous claims should have to pay the legal fees of the defendant.

Another way to help the uninsured would be to allow doctors, clinics, and hospitals to take a tax deduction equivalent to the fair market value of a service provided to a patient who can’t afford to pay.  Though the doctor doesn’t receive income this does allow him to reduce his tax burden while at the same time helping a poor person.

Flag Comment Posted by RANDYDOWDY on June 28, 2009 at 9:40 am

Obamasamas administration has already declared that illegal are entitled to every right our constitution provides us citizens, while their being here is a crime from day 1.  The average citizen will lose out once again.  He says it will be paid for by cost cuts and savings.  So he admits that there is that much waste?  Hogwash.  Taxes will go up.  The rich will pay off their congressmen to prevent their taxes being raised.  The poorest will give up because they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.  Guess who that leaves?  The middle class, who once again will be stuck with the tab.  BIG GOV’T is never good at anything except screwing up things for people who are trying to carry their own weight.

All these entitlements are out of control.  It is not the gov’ts responsibility to provide for our every need.  Personal responsibility should be a priority.  If you don’t help yourself, no one else should.  Folks need to get all these entitlements out of our minds   and start using some common sense, if there is any left.  We seem to be running a deficity on that too lately. 

If the gov’t wants to help, truly wants to help people, then they ought to fix this job catastrophe.  It is their fault the jobs went overseas, after all, they signed the bills allowing it.  Our enemies aren’t that far away, they are right up the road in the offices that we elected them to.  Corruption is in every party.  Morality is long gone.  If we keep borrowing from the Chinese, soon they will come to collect.  Won’t that be nice?

Flag Comment Posted by Meee42 on June 28, 2009 at 6:44 am

Go ahead and get a National Health Care. The Rich are gonna have theirs and the poor are gonna have theirs our government will see to that by taking the money out of our checks. The ONLY way that the average joe will EVER see a benefit from the monies that the government steals from us, is to get a National Health care. I get so sick of the argument that the government will be telling you what doctors you can see. Right now Blue Cross tells us what doctors we can see. That is scary because they are in it for the money. I think that I would like it better if a neutral person was doing the picking LOL LOL It can’t possibly cost us anymore in taxes than we are already paying in premiums. The main difference would be that should we get sick we won’t lose our home because we can’t afford the 20%.

Flag Comment Posted by ravencottage on June 28, 2009 at 6:23 am

Obama’s health care plan includes illegal aliens…everyone ok with that?

Flag Comment Posted by hsr0601 on June 28, 2009 at 3:22 am

I think, given the fact that health insurance premiums have doubled over the last decade at an unsustainable rate three times faster than wages, the status more than 97% of all Massachusetts residents,the highest in the U.S.,  are now covered could be touted as success model, which features ‘mandating insurance’ and an option to purchase coverage through the “Connector,“ a program in which private insurers are required to offer coverage to those who can’t get other insurance, regardless of age or health status.
But the Massachusetts model has a problem with costs control, because it relies exclusively on private insurers as Massachusetts’ insurers implemented average premium increases of 8% to 12% only in 2008.  And it highlights the necessity of having a publicly financed insurance option
To be sure, in case the president’s proposal with respect to the strong public option, medical IT, increased efforts in prevention, and a broader array of cost-saving plans and beyond adds to the Massachusetts Plan with the provision of employer mandate and an individual mandate, the cost containment does not matter at all. And most importantly, the promising stem cell research is making its way.

Human health, in a sense, may precede all the other basic human rights as everything means nothing for someone without it. As far as my common sense goes, the major role of government will be to protect basic rights of the public from any threat. That is why all of the industrialized countries have public policy in place, I guess.
Under this premise, the strong public option needs to be cited as a part of ‘PROTECTION’ like anti-trust law rather than intervention.
The intention to introduce the public choice would be to protect the uninsured, economy and keep the medical industry honest, not be to drive it out.
Hopefully, the health industry can provide reasonable,fair, competitive prices and quality service via tireless innovations like most of the EUROPE, instead of concerning about its monopoly prices, otherwise the forthcoming health start-ups will likely fill in the blanks with competitive terms over time.

Flag Comment Posted by news_u_can_use on June 27, 2009 at 11:25 pm

I am not sure who you speak of in this editorial when you say “area officials”. The folks you quoted are not official. Kay Crane just flat out is   wrong when she says there are only Anthem or Gateway available here. Personally I have had insurance from Untied Health Care, Nationwide, Metropolitan, First Health and others.  There are hundreds of health insurance companies available here. If Crane is so ill informed about this aspect of insurance,  she is not in a position to comment one way or the other on this important subject, and surely not qualified to be called “official”.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

GoDanRiver: Place an Ad | Buy Photos | Subscribe | Email Us | Email Alerts | Mobile Alerts | Make Us Your Home Page | Site Search
Partners: GoDanRiver is a service of the Danville Register Bee, the Eden Daily News, the Reidsville Review and the Madison Messenger.
Regional Partner Links: Lynchburg News & Advance | WSLS | Winston-Salem Journal | headlineVA.com